Alliances... the bane of her existance! (Part I)
"What experience and history teach is this -- that people and governments never have learned anything from history, or acted on principles." (George Wilhelm Hegel)
It seems there's another alliance -- bigger & broader than ever before, in the making in
Get the hell outta here!
From what I have been gathering, all the minor political parties are putting forward "demands" to each of the presidential candidates in order to ensure their support. I am sure all these demands are fully justified, and well-intended.
First thing to consider by the electorate though is whether good leaders easily bow down to such demands. I would assume that a leader is a person with a vision backed by the passion and dedication to see this vision through. A leader is not a person who prostitutes him or herself around in order to muster support. Of course, a leader has to listen to others and have a conciliatory approach on an array of wide ranging issues. However, that does not mean bowing down to each and every fancy of other people.
Secondly, I think it is high time Sri Lankans too a hard look back at coalitions as a whole. There have been many coalitions that promised the sun, the moon, and bread at Rs.3.50. They have come, they have ruled, they have... well, they have just been there... stagnating the country and forever debating their policies. Alliances in contemporary Sri Lankan politic are alliances of necessity, rather than alliances of policy or consensus.
Alliances come together to either break, make, break & make, or make & break governments. The policies with an alliance are divergent and often mutually exclusive. Consider the most recent alliance in SL for an example of how pathetic the situation is. The so called Blue-Red alliance came about with a very appealing, nationalist claim that the RW government was betraying the country vis-à-vis the CFA. While there were other issues, everything revolved around this "fact" which superseded everything else. Yet, what was the policy of the alliance that was put together to save the country, regarding this all important issue? If that was one policy that was needed to govern SL, it had to be a policy regarding the LTTE. I'm not dwelling on what type of policy to have, but emphasizing the need to have a policy - good, bad or ugly.
The policy statement was a mere agreement to disagree on a policy framework. The two parties had divergent views, which were caste aside in an opportunistic power-grab by hoodwinking the people of the land.
"Shame on you if you fool me once, shame on me if you fool me twice."
